63 Page of Rubbish

 FA’s 63 page report was like an emotional and malicious prosecutor’s final speech not an imperturbable third party report.

The report should be rephrased at best something like:

  “Based upon a lengthy and costly investigation and hearing, we found nothing of very conclusive. We found Mr Terry is not a racist but he used the word ‘black’ once during the heated verbal exchange and it merited four match ban and proportional fine.”

 According to papers all conclusions were based ‘on the balance of probabilities’ not a single matter on the fact.

 ‘Improbable, implausible and contrived’ it read, but there is a big jump between the first two and the last one. It sounds unlikely and it is hard to believe, they are your opinions or your feelings, but when you say you contrived, that is a condemnation. It must be based on the fact not on your belief or feelings.
 ‘At no point is his demeanour and facial expression that of someone who is imploring, injured, or even quizzical in the face of an unfounded allegation’ is the unfounded allegation. Give me a break. You cannot be accused of simply a facial expression, when you protest you may get excited or may be sarcastic, you cannot tell.
 Even for the Cole’s alteration of his words, we hear only one side of the story considering with the total tone of the report how can we take it as a face value?
 The report says Terry is not a racist based upon many character witnesses but still it says Terry used the B-word as a part of insult. If B-word can be an insult for someone it means he is a racist, isn’t he? The report is a product of contradictions. So it cannot be an imperturbable analysis but a harshly written emotional report.
 The report is a waste of words and guesses, like my writings.